OpenTelemetry to Zipkin Transformation¶
Status: Stable
This document defines the transformation between OpenTelemetry and Zipkin Spans. The generic transformation rules specified here also apply. If a particular generic transformation rule and the rule in this document contradict then the rule in this document MUST be used.
Zipkin's v2 API is defined in the zipkin.proto
Summary¶
The following table summarizes the major transformations between OpenTelemetry and Zipkin.
OpenTelemetry | Zipkin | Notes |
---|---|---|
Span.TraceId | Span.trace_id | |
Span.ParentId | Span.parent_id | |
Span.SpanId | Span.id | |
Span.TraceState | TBD | TBD |
Span.Name | Span.name | |
Span.Kind | Span.kind | See SpanKind for values mapping |
Span.StartTime | Span.timestamp | See Unit of time |
Span.EndTime | Span.duration | Duration is calculated based on StartTime and EndTime. See also Unit of time |
Span.Attributes | Add to Span.tags | See Attributes for data types for the mapping. |
Span.DroppedAttributesCount | Add to Span.tags | See Dropped Attributes Count for tag name to use. |
Span.Events | Span.annotations | See Events for the mapping format. |
Span.DroppedEventsCount | Add to Span.tags | See Dropped Events Count for tag name to use. |
Span.Links | TBD | TBD |
Span.DroppedLinksCount | Add to Span.tags | See Dropped Links Count for tag name to use. |
Span.Status | Add to Span.tags | See Status for tag names to use. |
TBD : This is work in progress document and it is currently doesn't specify mapping for these fields:
OpenTelemetry fields:
- Resource attributes
- Tracestate
- Links
Zipkin fields:
- local_endpoint
- debug
- shared
Mappings¶
This section discusses the details of the transformations between OpenTelemetry and Zipkin.
Service name¶
Zipkin service name MUST be set to the value of the
resource attribute:
service.name
. If no service.name
is contained in a Span's Resource, it MUST be populated from the
default Resource
.
In Zipkin it is important that the service name is consistent
for all spans in a local root. Otherwise service graph and aggregations would
not work properly. OpenTelemetry doesn't provide this consistency guarantee.
Exporter may chose to override the value for service name based on a local root
span to improve Zipkin user experience.
Note, the attribute service.namespace
MUST NOT be used for the Zipkin
service name and should be sent as a Zipkin tag.
SpanKind¶
The following table lists all the SpanKind
mappings between OpenTelemetry and
Zipkin.
OpenTelemetry | Zipkin | Note |
---|---|---|
SpanKind.CLIENT |
SpanKind.CLIENT |
|
SpanKind.SERVER |
SpanKind.SERVER |
|
SpanKind.CONSUMER |
SpanKind.CONSUMER |
|
SpanKind.PRODUCER |
SpanKind.PRODUCER |
|
SpanKind.INTERNAL |
null |
must be omitted (set to null ) |
Remote endpoint¶
OTLP -> Zipkin¶
If Zipkin SpanKind
resolves to either SpanKind.CLIENT
or SpanKind.PRODUCER
then the service SHOULD specify remote endpoint otherwise Zipkin won't treat the
Span as a dependency. peer.service
is the preferred attribute but is not
always available. The following table lists the possible attributes for
remoteEndpoint
by preferred ranking:
Rank | Attribute Name | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 | peer.service | OpenTelemetry adopted attribute for remote service. |
2 | server.address | OpenTelemetry adopted attribute for remote hostname, or similar. |
3 | server.socket.domain | OpenTelemetry adopted attribute for remote socket hostname of the peer. |
4 | server.socket.address & server.socket.port | OpenTelemetry adopted attribute for remote socket address of the peer. |
5 | peer.hostname | Remote hostname defined in OpenTracing specification. |
6 | peer.address | Remote address defined in OpenTracing specification. |
7 | db.name | Commonly used database name attribute for DB Spans. |
- Ranking should control the selection order. For example,
server.address
(Rank 2) should be selected beforepeer.address
(Rank 6). server.socket.domain
andserver.socket.address
can be used by themselves asremoteEndpoint
but should be combined withserver.socket.port
if it is also present.
Zipkin -> OTLP¶
When mapping from Zipkin to OTLP set peer.service
tag from remoteEndpoint
unless there is a peer.service
tag defined explicitly.
Attribute¶
OpenTelemetry Span Attribute
(s) MUST be reported as tags
to
Zipkin.
Some attributes defined in semantic convention document maps to the strongly-typed fields of Zipkin spans.
Primitive types MUST be converted to string using en-US culture settings.
Boolean values MUST use lower case strings "true"
and "false"
.
Array values MUST be serialized to string like a JSON list as mentioned in semantic conventions.
TBD: add examples
Status¶
This section overrides the generic Status mapping rule.
Span Status
MUST be reported as a key-value pair in tags
to Zipkin, unless it is UNSET
.
In the latter case it MUST NOT be reported.
The following table defines the OpenTelemetry Status
to Zipkin tags
mapping.
Status | Tag Key | Tag Value |
---|---|---|
Code | otel.status_code |
Name of the code, either OK or ERROR . MUST NOT be set if the code is UNSET . |
Description | error |
Description of the Status . MUST be set if the code is ERROR , use an empty string if Description has no value. MUST NOT be set for OK and UNSET codes. |
Note: The error
tag should only be set if Status
is Error
. If a boolean
version ({"error":false}
or {"error":"false"}
) is present, it SHOULD be
removed. Zipkin will treat any span with error
sent as failed.
Events¶
OpenTelemetry Event
has an optional Attribute
(s) which is not supported by
Zipkin. Events MUST be converted to the Annotations with the names which will
include attribute values like this:
Unit of Time¶
Zipkin times like timestamp
, duration
and annotation.timestamp
MUST be
reported in microseconds as whole numbers. For example, duration
of 1234 nanoseconds will be represented as 1 microsecond.
Request Payload¶
For performance considerations, Zipkin fields that can be absent SHOULD be
omitted from the payload when they are empty in the OpenTelemetry Span
.
For example, an OpenTelemetry Span
without any Event
should not have an
annotations
field in the Zipkin payload.
Considerations for Legacy (v1) Format¶
Zipkin's v2 json format was defined in 2017, followed up by a protobuf format in 2018.
Frameworks made before then use a more complex v1 Thrift or json format that notably differs in so far as it uses terminology such as Binary Annotation, and repeats endpoint information on each attribute.
Consider using V1SpanConverter.java as a reference implementation for converting v1 model to OpenTelemetry.
The span timestamp and duration were late additions to the V1 format. As in the code link above, it is possible to heuristically derive them from annotations.